Are "Interactive White Boards" transformative to your teaching and/or classroom?

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Christopher Klein on February 10, 2009 at 10:05am

Let's keep this vendor neutral, Jim. This is a pedagogical discussion, not a list of my company's marketing points.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Scott Beiter on February 3, 2009 at 5:51pm

I agree with Stu that professional development is key. Also of importance is that companies that make the boards also supply teaching tools (templates, lessons, images etc) to go with the board. Just a Wiimote IWB or Tablet won't have these features. For instance, I use a Starboard and can bring up different graphing grids for students to use. I didn't have to search the internet for the images. The companies also allow for other features such as screencasting and screen capture which you would need a different program for not using one of these boards. While considering IWBs remember that they probably won't suddenly increase scores on standardized tests. They will increase student engagement, student use of technology, and teacher use of technology.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jill Olson on February 3, 2009 at 8:40pm

I use mine with at least one group of kids almost every day. I teach elementary music and find it to be extremely valuable. It is great for so many things. I use it with the active software as well to get online and manipulate websites and to use with just about any software I would use in the classroom. I was talking to the campus computer tech person and I caught myself "air-penning" for lack of a better term. In the past I might have made a motion like I was moving a mouse when I was talking about something but today I was poking at the air like I had the pen in my hand pointed at the board. In other words, I use it all the time. For my purposes with large classes the board works great and the kids love the opportunity to get on the board.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Lezlie Harris on February 4, 2009 at 6:15pm

I teach elementary school and WE use the interactive white board 90% of the day. The interaction is not for me; it is for the students. They need to be active listeners and participants. I believe using a slate would be a distraction rather than an asset for learning for 7 and 8 year olds. It's hard for them to even copy words from the board.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Heidi on February 6, 2009 at 11:05am

IWBs are most definitely worth the money! I just got a Smartboard in my classroom two weeks ago and use it all day, every day. Whether I have prepared a lesson to share through direct instruction or provide resources to engage students during group work, the Smartboard has become an integral part of my classroom. The students are eager to participate in lesson. Hands are up before the questions are asked. My students know they will have many opportunities to interact with the Smartboard. Most recently, we picked names for a new seating chart and the first row was filled first because "that way I'm closer to the Smartboard." Students love it and I love it as well!

Now I would just love a few classroom computers for students to explore technology in the classroom instead of during their 80 minutes a week in the computer lab.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric on February 6, 2009 at 11:34am

I think they are bang for the buck!! With many features and since students are changing, IWb keep student interest as well promote an active not passive lesson. As far as what is better, I ma not sure yet. I currently us a Smartboard, but will be getting a tablet soon to see what I like better for 4th graders. I have also helped another teacher set up a wiimote IWB, and it is going well.
Also, I have seen a mimio whiteboard that can be cheaper, and still go a great job.

Stu is right 100% with the training! Also, my 2 biggest frustrations are 1. Projector not being mounted, so I need to orient often with my 10 year olds, and 2. teachers that have them in the room, but only use them for certain subjects and not all subjects! If you have one, you better use it, or it should be given to another teacher!! Just my opinion!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Gavin Agnew on February 6, 2009 at 12:27pm

The comments above about PD are the most important here IMHO, but so too is teacher motivation. I have teachers who have bought into this in a big way and are getting real value out of their IWB's (and the students love using them too), and teachers who were very enthusiastic at the PD sessions, but who lack the motivation to spend the time preparing real interactive lessons and so it becomes a glorified whiteboard. These teachers will be losing the boards if there is no greater uptake as we expect more ROI for these. To answer your question, yes they represent bang for your buck.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike Haudenschild on February 6, 2009 at 12:58pm

I agree with comments made here about considering other technologies that yield the same, or better, results, such as wireless tablets/slates or TabletPCs. The buzz about interactive whiteboards is stunning, but ultimately it's about what instructional problem is solved, or what instructional opportunity is captured that couldn't be before the technology. It's not the specific too itself so much as the fundamentally unique features the tool provides in the classroom.

I'll also echo what's been said about professional development. In K-12 we have a history of investing more in the technology itself than in what comes after--focused and ongoing professional development. Provide teachers "situated" opportunities to learn the technology by providing hands-on seminars and workshops where teachers actually build learning activities for students, and come away with a fully-functioning lesson plan full of great resources.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dale Ehrhart on February 7, 2009 at 4:52pm

I've worked with Smartboards, love 'em, but Iust got my wii remote interactive whiteboard up and running this week.....and I love it. For $60.00, I'd put this into a classroom and put the savings elsewhere.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by John Sowash on February 7, 2009 at 6:16pm

I am a fan of any technology that gets students out of the seats and actively engages them in a lesson. Static learning is not as effective or as fun as dynamic learning. IWB provide dynamic learning opportunities.

I created my own smartboard from a Nintendo Wii controller. This technology has become fairly popular and well known in the educational community. My setup achieves about 80% of the function of a traditional smartboard for about 10% of the cost. I expect that continued innovation will allow this technology to compete with traditional IWB.

The primary barrier of schools using IWB is cost. The "wiiboard" enables schools to afford this technology. Check it out-- you might be able to incorporate it into your school.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dale Ehrhart on February 8, 2009 at 12:14am

"My setup achieves about 80% of the function of a traditional smartboard for about 10% of the cost"

just wondering if you use a onscreen drawing program to write on webpages etc.
I'm trialing e-pointer ($45.00), but I've just found freeware called virtualboard that look really promising.
Here are the downloads

virtualboard
http://www.tucows.com/preview/379208 Homepage: http://lightools.fredisland.net/


e-pointer
http://www.foredu.com/e-pointer/

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike on February 8, 2009 at 6:43pm

Why not project onto a traditional whiteboard and then use markers to write on the webpage?

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• …
• 6
• Next ›
• Page