Maths education – dire or inspire?

You could see the panic in their faces - and then the relief.

They were students in their final year of high school on a visit to campus to explore the possibility of “going to uni” after they finished their compulsory schooling. I had, perhaps perversely, set up an experiment. I had told them that two of them would find a red dot under their seat - and if they were one of these people they would come forward and participate in a simple mental mathematics activity. Panic turned to relief as, chair after chair, they stood and did not find a dot. It had been a trick - but one with a purpose.

It may have been cruel - but the momentary discomfort was worth the discussion. I asked them how they felt when they thought they may have to do a simple maths activity in front of their peers. Who had a nervous uneasy reaction in the pit of their stomach? Almost everyone felt this way (except those girls too cool for school with more product in their hair than even the law of gravity could cope with - and there a was no way that they would be going up!!!). We discussed that fact that so many people had that reaction.

We discussed why they thought that way and what they thought mathematics was about.

The conversation quickly distilled to mathematics teaching and text books. Most of the students really do not like mathematics; many do not understand it - even if they can complete the required procedures. Most thought that mathematics was what took place at school, or when you were shopping or later in life if you worked in an office.

I was not surprised - for these groups mirrored previous groups; same experiment, same reaction, same discussion - same finding. In short, most of our students leaving the mandated years of schooling do not like mathematics - especially the way it is taught. This reaction is also wide-spread when I conduct the same experiment with pre-service teachers.

Why does this continue to be the case? This is a deceptively simple question. The answers range from teachers teaching out of area (and therefore having both a reduced skill set and limited knowledge base), teaching to the text, the mistaken belief that “old fashioned” teaching produces better test results (assuming that we accept that as a valid indicator) and so forth. But rather than unpack this I’d rather simply contrast traditional text book based learning with something different.

What might good mathematics teaching look like?

One thing that students consistently mention is the use of multimedia. I’m not suggesting that we plug our students into the Khan Academy and walk away - far from it in fact. Another item frequently mentioned is relevance or interest - statements such as “You’ll need this later in life” do not sit well with these students. They want relevance now - and why not?

So how can we interest students in mathematics? We can start by moving away from a reliance on text books and meaningless exercises. Those who need convincing watch Dan Meyer’s TED talk.

Why not let the beauty of maths speak for itself? Let your children watch this and see how many are interested in looking at symmetry then.

Vi Hart’s famous hi speed doodling / ranting also make good watching - and could easily prompt school based follow up lessons (which is ironic given Vi’s iconoclastic style).

What about this amazing clip showing what happens when pendulums of slightly different lengths are released simultaneously?

Or watch Kjartan Poskitt taking his “murderous maths” to the street. Just look at the faces of the people in the street at he performs his ABC x 7 Xx11 x 13 trick. These people are fascinated - by mental mathematics!

Or visit www.mathpickle.com for videos of children at work in real maths classrooms on real problems - visit the “Hard fun is how we learn best” clip to see primary students playing with factorisation.

I’m not suggesting that maths lessons need to be fun in the arcade game sense - but they should be engaging, stimulating and challenging (ironically, characteristics that are associated with video games). Nor am I suggesting that we replace every lesson with video oddities and novelties. However, the use of videos such as these can encourage real life exploration of mathematics. They can provide launch pads into “hands on” investigation of mathematics. In short, they can inspire our math classes.

You could see the panic in their faces - and then the relief.

They were students in their final year of high school on a visit to campus to explore the possibility of “going to uni” after they finished their compulsory schooling. I had, perhaps perversely, set up an experiment. I had told them that two of them would find a red dot under their seat - and if they were one of these people they would come forward and participate in a simple mental mathematics activity. Panic turned to relief as, chair after chair, they stood and did not find a dot. It had been a trick - but one with a purpose.

It may have been cruel - but the momentary discomfort was worth the discussion. I asked them how they felt when they thought they may have to do a simple maths activity in front of their peers. Who had a nervous uneasy reaction in the pit of their stomach? Almost everyone felt this way (except those girls too cool for school with more product in their hair than even the law of gravity could cope with - and there a was no way that they would be going up!!!). We discussed that fact that so many people had that reaction.

We discussed why they thought that way and what they thought mathematics was about.

The conversation quickly distilled to mathematics teaching and text books. Most of the students really do not like mathematics; many do not understand it - even if they can complete the required procedures. Most thought that mathematics was what took place at school, or when you were shopping or later in life if you worked in an office.

I was not surprised - for these groups mirrored previous groups; same experiment, same reaction, same discussion - same finding. In short, most of our students leaving the mandated years of schooling do not like mathematics - especially the way it is taught. This reaction is also wide-spread when I conduct the same experiment with pre-service teachers.

Why does this continue to be the case? This is a deceptively simple question. The answers range from teachers teaching out of area (and therefore having both a reduced skill set and limited knowledge base), teaching to the text, the mistaken belief that “old fashioned” teaching produces better test results (assuming that we accept that as a valid indicator) and so forth. But rather than unpack this I’d rather simply contrast traditional text book based learning with something different.

What might good mathematics teaching look like?

One thing that students consistently mention is the use of multimedia. I’m not suggesting that we plug our students into the Khan Academy and walk away - far from it in fact. Another item frequently mentioned is relevance or interest - statements such as “You’ll need this later in life” do not sit well with these students. They want relevance now - and why not?

So how can we interest students in mathematics? We can start by moving away from a reliance on text books and meaningless exercises. Those who need convincing watch Dan Meyer’s TED talk.

Why not let the beauty of maths speak for itself? Let your children watch this and see how many are interested in looking at symmetry then.

Flottille (detail) from Etienne Cliquet on Vimeo.

Vi Hart’s famous hi speed doodling / ranting also make good watching - and could easily prompt school based follow up lessons (which is ironic given Vi’s iconoclastic style).

What about this amazing clip showing what happens when pendulums of slightly different lengths are released simultaneously?

Or watch Kjartan Poskitt taking his “murderous maths” to the street. Just look at the faces of the people in the street at he performs his ABC x 7 Xx11 x 13 trick. These people are fascinated - by mental mathematics!

Or visit www.mathpickle.com for videos of children at work in real maths classrooms on real problems - visit the “Hard fun is how we learn best” clip to see primary students playing with factorisation.

I’m not suggesting that maths lessons need to be fun in the arcade game sense - but they should be engaging, stimulating and challenging (ironically, characteristics that are associated with video games). Nor am I suggesting that we replace every lesson with video oddities and novelties. However, the use of videos such as these can encourage real life exploration of mathematics. They can provide launch pads into “hands on” investigation of mathematics. In short, they can inspire our math classes.

If you are representing a commercial entity, please see the specific guidelines on your participation.

© 2019 Created by Steve Hargadon. Powered by

## You need to be a member of Classroom 2.0 to add comments!

Join Classroom 2.0