Geoff St. Pierre

cosecant arguments; not like you think the other argument.

for csc(2n+1) ; the "2n + 1" is considered the argument. The argument I am referring to in the title is the age old battle between what should you know and what should you be able to get, look up, or derive when needed.

The battle rages on. Here is my update to the JS Maths Wiki that was inspired by one such argument (very civil) that I participated in at a holiday party for the staff at our school. Here is the derivation of the derivative of cosecant of x.

Views: 0

Tags: FOSS, calculus, math, mathematics, maths, mediawiki, wiki

Comment

You need to be a member of Classroom 2.0 to add comments!

Join Classroom 2.0

Visitor Map

Locations of visitors to this page

Support:

Classroom 2.0 is a free site. You can support the network by making a donation (any amount):


You can also support us by using our Amazon search link:


Thanks to support from:

Badge

Loading…

About

Follow

Awards:

© 2012   Created by Steve Hargadon.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service