The $55 Interactive Whiteboard

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Jason Knight on September 7, 2008 at 6:00am

I put one together this summer. The only tricky part is finding a good placement for the wiimote. Far back gives you a bigger working area, but you lose sensitivity of the mouse cursor and vice versa. Then you have to find a way to position out of the way of students. I picked up a $10 travel tripod that I have suspended from my classroom ceiling. It is up out of easy reach of students, except for maybe the basketball team. But, I'm still not happy with my results. You can run it with 2 remotes to give you a bigger working area (each remote is then covering part of your work space) or have both covering the same space to give you greater sensitivity. I may have to try that.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ben Jones on September 7, 2008 at 6:42am

Jason
Are you using Boonjins application? http://www.boonjin.com/wp he has included a visual calibration assistant that will help maximise the visualisation area.

Which IR-Led & Switch are you using? These have a major impact on the outcome I suggest you use a tactile or Mini SPDT switch with a Vishay TSAL6400 IR-Led for best performance.

Ben :-)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike on September 7, 2008 at 11:37am

My students made one of these this summer. They made a wiki about it that shows everything from wiimote postion, to calibration, to how to make an ir pen.

wiimotewhiteboards4macs.wikispaces.com

If you want to make life easier in terms of software - just get KindleLab. KindleLab is an open source alternative that is free. It's similar to SMART's Notepad and Promethean's Active Studio.

I've used it in class and it is mildly entertaining, but I still don't think interactive whiteboards really enhance education. When it comes down to it, only one kid is up at the board "manipulating" things while everyone else just waits for their turn, mostly oblivious to what the student at the board is actually doing. Interaction means collaboration with others and manipulation can be done with a lot of things besides an iboard.

The wiimote board is a great option to have the functionality without wasting the money on all the other stuff. The difference between the wiimote and the alternatives is that no one is paid to hawk the wiimotes. Unfortunately, the reps from the companies don't show administrators that you can do all the things they show you without their product. Hopefully, administrators can open their eyes to this soon.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ben Jones on September 7, 2008 at 5:19pm

Mike
I totally agree!
I think their needs to be some serious discourse around this concept of "Have technology, will learn!".
Technology without pedagogy is just expensively resourced busywork. We have several videos (Welsh, Prensky, et al) being presented ad nauseam at professional development, the message of technology is done. What needs to be chunked down, deconstructed and discussed is the pedagogy that underpins the technology that enhances teaching and learning above BT (before technology).

I think we really need to evaluate and question the role of $5000 IWB's in the context of 'Bang for the buck' (as I feel it is seriously limited). Hence the advantage of $55 equivalent, leaving $4945 to spend on resources that deliver a serious educational return on investment.

Ben

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike on September 7, 2008 at 5:53pm

I'm glad that I'm not alone in feeling that way. You make some great points about the pedagogy surrounding technology. All too often, I've seen situations where large sums of money are spent with little thought or investigation into outcomes or less expensive alternatives. As you point out, those large sums can be spent a lot better.

I love technology and finding good uses for it in the classroom, but people can make an even bigger difference. Instead of buying 3-4 IWBs, why not hire a part time reading specialist to help struggling readers. If the money is earmarked for technology, why not buy a cart of rolling laptops that each student in a class could use instead of just one student going to an IWB to "interact" with it. Why not have 15-25 students interacting with the teacher, and each other, at the same time? (Google Docs, Wikis, etc.)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Michael Wacker on September 7, 2008 at 9:11pm

Great points Mike and Ben. I couldn't agree more about the use of the resources available. I love the idea and the interaction of IWB's but without sound strategies it's just another expensive toy in an area where money is already too tight.

Thanks for sharing, I'll probably give the $55 IWB a shot and hopefully begin a discussion in my school about how and why we are using these resources.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Neil Lavitt on April 11, 2009 at 4:34pm

IWB's are only toys where they are being used as an expensive projector screen. Perhaps you should ask the kids what they think. In most cases the answer is they improve their experience significantly.

The answer to avoiding the Toy issue is professional development and a whole school approach. This is a new technology - it needs gestation and reflection.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Neil Lavitt on April 11, 2009 at 4:30pm

Hmmm...

Many of you seem to have forgotten that the Wiiremote is not the only cost here. Why, they only replace the board (and even then you need a decent whiteboard anyway? Clearly the majority of the cost of an interactive classroom is: Projector installation (pretty expensive if done correctly); ongoing supply of projectors and globes; the cost of the computer and associated software. The boards themselves are only a 3rd of the cost in a decent installation.

As for not enhancing learning. This is very naive as a significant part of the experience in indeed significance, the improvement in structure caused by teachers collaborative creation of interactive lessons as well as the ability of reuse and re-purpose.

I agree that learning is done through collaboration and doing, but the environment to facilitate that is also critical. As such, the interactive experience triggers substantive communication and focuses the learner through a more significant environment.

For me the 'simply works' factor of a proper SmartBoard like setup with a decent low throw projectors makes this so much better. The Wiiremote approach is 80% of the way there and it is worth doing, but it is not a final solution and we should not compromise of the setup as the simplicity of use is what will bring the low tech teachers to the party. Remember this is in primary schools by necessity a blackboard replacement as well.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rich White on September 7, 2008 at 11:54am

Might check out these as well:
http://kindlelab.com - Opensource IWB tools
http://edusim3d.com - Virtual worlds for your IWB





-

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Graham Cahill on November 27, 2008 at 2:45am

The Mac version is at:
http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/29358
Seems to work very well although placement of the remote is still a bit tricky. A Tripod seems to be the best solution. Experiment with placement (angle from board and distance) until you find a position that works. If all else fails, Wii games are fun!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ben Jones on November 27, 2008 at 2:55am

Go direct to the software author @ http://www.uweschmidt.org/wiimote-whiteboard

Boonjin's Windows version works in Bootcamp and is far more functional.

Ben :-)

• ▶ Reply